Tuesday, April 24, 2018






Iron - the "I" in Mudpiles





Iron overdose as a cause of a high anion gap metabolic acidosis

Now, iron is usually mentioned as an important cause of metabolic acidosis, and there is a warm spot reserved for it in the “MUDPILES” mnemonic. An impressionable person might be inclined to believe that iron contributes to the high anion gap metabolic acidosis by dissociating into unmeasured anions, much like the toxic alcohols. However, that would be wildly inaccurate, because iron is a cation.
The acidosis here is multifactorial. Some textbooks (Fowler’s Handbook on the Toxicology of Metals) suggest that the acidosis is mainly due to the physicochemical effects of the iron ion itself. Other sources (Goldfranks Manual of Toxicologic Emergencies) attribute the acidosis to a raised lactate, of which not all is generated by direct effects of the iron, but rather due to the fluid loss (from an ulcerated gut), cardiogenic shock (due to the myocardial mitochondrial toxicity) and fulminant hepatic failure. On top of that, a fair portion of the lactic acidosis is due to the direct mitochondrial toxicity of iron in all tissues.



Hyperkalemia - extra lecture stuff



Fig. 3 Illustration of a normal action potential (solid line) and the action potential as seen in the setting of hyperkalemia (interrupted line). The phases of the action potential are labeled on the normal action potential. Note the decrease in both the resting membrane potential and the rate of phase 0 of the action potential (Vmax) seen in hyperkalemia. Phase 2 and 3 of the action potential have a greater slope in the setting of hyperkalemia compared with the normal action potential.

Phase 0 of the action potential occurs when voltage-gated sodium channels open and sodium enters the myocyte down its electrochemical gradient (Fig. 3). The rate of rise of phase 0 of the action potential (Vmax) is directly proportional to the value of the resting membrane potential at the onset of phase 0.This is because the membrane potential at the onset of depolarization determines the number of sodium channels activated during depolarization, which in turn determines the magnitude of the inward sodium current and the Vmax of the action potential. As illustrated in Figure 4, Vmax is greatest when the resting membrane potential at the onset of the action potential is approximately −75 mV, and does not increase as the membrane potential becomes more negative. Conversely, as the resting membrane potential becomes less negative (that is, −70 mV), as in the setting of hyperkalemia (Fig. 3), the percentage of available sodium channels decreases. This decrease leads to a decrement in the inward sodium current and a concurrent decrease in the Vmax; therefore, as the resting membrane potential becomes less negative in hyperkalemia, Vmax decreases. This decrease in Vmax causes a slow-ing of impulse conduction through the myocardium and a prolongation of membrane depolarization; as a result, the QRS duration is prolonged.

In summary, the early effect of mild hyperkalemia on myocyte function is to increase myocyte excitability by shifting the resting membrane potential to a less negative value and thus closer to threshold potential; but as potassium levels continue to rise, myocyte depression occurs and Vmax continues to decrease.

Hyperkalemia also has profound effects upon phase 2 and phase 3 of the action potential. After the rapid influx of sodium across the cell membrane in phase 0, potassium ions leave the cell along its electrochemical gradient, which is reflected in phase 1 of the action potential. As the membrane potential reaches −40 to −45 mV during phase 0, calcium channels are stimulated, allowing calcium to enter the myocyte. The maximum conductance of these channels occurs approximately 50 msec after the initiation of phase 0 and is reflected in phase 2 of the action potential. During phase 2, potassium efflux and calcium in-flux offset one another so that the electrical charge across the cell membrane remains the same, and the so-called plateau phase of the action potential is created (Fig. 3). During phase 3, the calcium channels close, while the potassium channels continue to conduct potassium out of the cell; in this way, the electronegative membrane potential is restored. One of the potassium currents (Ikr), located on the myocyte cell membrane, is mostly responsible for the potassium efflux seen during phases 2 and 3 of the cardiac action potential. For reasons that are not well understood, these Ikr currents are sensitive to extracellular potassium levels, and as the potassium levels increase in the extracellular space, potassium conductance through these currents is increased so that more potassium leaves the myocyte in any given time period. This leads to an increase in the slope of phases 2 and 3 of the action potential in patients with hyperkalemia and therefore, to a shortening of the repolarization time. This is thought to be the mechanism responsible for some of the early electrocardiographic manifestations of hyperkalemia, such as ST-T segment depression, peaked T waves, and Q-T interval shortening.

Monday, April 23, 2018

Urine Osmolarity in SIADH




Urinary Na excretion
In SIADH, urinary loss of Na+ continues despite significant hyponatremia. In these patients, as in healthy patients, urinary Na+ excretion is a reflection of Na+ intake and, therefore, usually is greater than 20 mmol/L. However, in the setting of Na+restriction in patients with SIADH or in patients with volume depletion due to extrarenal losses, the urinary Na+ concentration may be very low.




Urine Osmolarity
Patients with hyponatremia should turn off ADH and have a urine that is maximally dilute (ie, 50-100 mOsm/kg); however, in patients with SIADH, the urinary osmolality is usually submaximally dilute (ie, >100 mOsm/kg). One of the more common errors in recognizing SIADH is the failure to realize that the urine’s osmolality must be only inappropriately elevated and not necessarily greater than the corresponding serum osmolality.


Formative Quiz 2 has a case of SIADH with a urine osmolarity of 850.  I think this is incorrect for reasons state above.